|
|
|
EURIM
Identity Governance Subgroup
Back to main
IG page
Introduction
The aim is to put current initiatives (including regulatory and legislative)
into the context of achievable policies and improve understanding on the part of
both government (politicians and officials) and citizens on how these could and
should be used to deliver better service as well as to help control fraud and
other crime.
Terms of reference
are being drafted in the light of the highly welcome central government adoption
of the principles of federated identity -
ISP
Safeguarding Identity Strategy.
| Experiences of Identity Governance |
IdenTrust’s Trust
Network
The Trust Network is a worldwide Scheme for the provision of
high-assurance trusted e-Identity credentials issued through the worlds
banks. The Trust Network provides a scale-able distributed architecture
capable of underpinning multiple applications across multiple networks
across multiple jurisdictions. The IdenTrust Trust Network is recognized
and used by Corporates, Governments and Banks around the world as a
framework which provides for Interoperability of eSignatures across
geographies, industry verticles, products, and supply chains. The
Network is supported by a contract-based liability management structure
which enables the effective management of the significant Operational
Risks related to the issuance of, and the reliance upon, electronic
credentials in a networked world, both domestically & globally, which
attest to the fundamental requirement of “Are you really are who you
say you are?”. It is core to each stage of 21st century Transaction
Management processes (including, but also preceding, the payment which
invariably forms the conclusion to any transaction).
View one pager
www.identrust.com |
JANET operates the UK
Access Management Federation for Education and Research. A Policy Board
ensures that the federation’s policies are implementable within
JANET(UK)’s legal framework. Organisations may join as an Identity
Provider (e.g. a university or local authority), or as a Service
Provider (e.g. a publisher or content provider), or as both. The
federation uses the standards-based Shibboleth software, which defines a
common framework for access management and governance that is being
adopted by education and commercial sectors across the world. More
details of the federation and framework are available at
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/aboutus/committees/workinggroups/
federationpolicy.aspx
and at:
http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/
Shibboleth’s policy framework will also allow
inter-operation within the higher education community. An illustrated
explanation of how Shibboleth works can be located at
http://www.ukfederation.org.uk/content/Documents/HowItWorks.
Although Shibboleth has been designed primarily for secure access to web
resources, work is ongoing to extend the framework for institutional
authentication and authorisation. |
|
The Global Trust
Council is an international organisation that introduces innovative
human rights in the digital world. They bridge the gap and reaffirm the
rights between the physical and digital worlds.
The GTC
framework enables users and legal entities to protect their intellectual
property rights, and makes them legally responsible for their actions in
digital interactions.
www.globaltrustcouncil.org |
Subgroup Outputs
| Date |
Description |
| Electronic
Voter Registration |
| Jul 10 |
Interim Note on electronic Voter Registration
(working draft for discussion only) |
| Jul 10 |
Table of responses: electoral registration schemes overseas |
| |
|
Identity Governance Papers |
| Jul 10 |
How do they know it is really you?
Brief Outline
(working draft) |
| May 10 |
How do they know it is really you? Draft 3-page Summary
(draft for discussion only) |
| May 10 |
How
do they know it is really you? Draft 1-page Flyer
(draft for discussion only) |
| Supporting Papers - HMG
Reports and Resources |
1) Trust Services e-Government Strategy Policy
Framework and Guidelines Version 3.0
Published by the Office of the e-Envoy in September
2002, this document describes a set of guidelines for e-government users
to have confidence in the services they use. The trust services enable
the parties to determine who originated the transaction (in which the
real-world identity binds to the electronic identity), whether the
transaction received matches the transaction sent, and whether the
recipient accepted the transaction. |
2) HMG's Minimum Requirements for the Verification of the Identity of
Organisations
Issued by the Office of
the e-Envoy in 2003, this detailed technical document supporting the
Registration & Authentication Framework represents a minor update to the
tScheme guideline for the Verification of the Identity of Organisations
in respect of access to Government services. It describes HMG's minimum
requirements for the validation and verification of an organisation's
identity as part of the process of issuing a digital certificate or a
PIN or Password for use with e-government services. |
|
3) HMG's Minimum Requirements for the Verification of the
Identity of Individuals
Issued by the Office of the e-Envoy in 2003, this detailed technical
document supporting the Registration & Authentication Framework
represents a minor update to the tScheme guideline for the Verification
of the Identity of Individuals in respect of access to Government
services. It describes HMG's minimum requirements for the validation and
verification of an individual's identity as part of the process of
issuing a digital certificate or a PIN or Password for use with
e-government services. |
4) A National Information Assurance Strategy
(Central Sponsor for Information Assurance - 2007)
The strategy identified three main goals: (i) to
make central and local government better able to deliver public services
through the appropriate use of IT; (ii) to strengthen the UK's national
security by protecting information and information systems at risk of
compromise; and (iii) to enhance the UK's economic and social well-being
as government, businesses and citizens realize the full benefits of IT.
The document noted that only 1% of UK businesses had a
comprehensive approach for identity management. An example of
comment on the strategy can be found at:
www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2007/08/24/226310/
National-Information-Assurance-Strategy-is-too-little-too-late-says.htm
|
5) Independent Review of Government Information Assurance (Nick
Coleman, 2008)
Commissioned by Cabinet
Office, the Coleman Report describes the rapid pace of technological
change, leading to information sharing and storage by Government on an
unprecedented scale. It notes the scale of identity fraud
costs to the UK economy, and exposes problems associated with
governance and risk management, with a series of recommendations
on information security governance, accountability, and setting minimum
standards. These include tackling identity management
challenges through mandating the use of privacy impact assessments,
and specifying standards of protection for identity registration,
management and use in government and the wider public sector. |
6 & 7) Data Handling Procedures in
Government:
Interim
and
Final Reports
(Cabinet Office, 2007, 2008)
The
final report is the outcome of a Prime Ministerial initiative in which
the Cabinet Secretary (Sir Gus O'Donnell), with the advice of security
experts, was asked to work with Departments to ensure that they and all
their agencies check their procedures for the storage and use of data.
The Interim Report, published on 17 December, summarized action taken
across Government and set out initial directions of reform to strengthen
the Government's arrangements. The Final Report summarizes work
conducted in Departments to improve data handling, and sets out how
measures should be put in place, with a new set of minimum mandatory
standards for Departments, including an undertaking to adopt Privacy
Impact Assessments, with standards of protection for identity management
as recommended by the Coleman Report. Information Charters should
improve transparency to the citizen. Improvements in information
security are to be achieved by putting in place:
-
core measures to protect
personal data and other information across Government;
-
a culture that properly
values, protects and uses information;
-
stronger accountability
mechanisms within Departments; and
-
stronger scrutiny of
performance.
|
8) OGC Procurement Policy Note 2008
This information note provides guidance on Cabinet
Office mandatory requirements for the adoption of OGC model contract
clauses and provisions relating to security (including the vetting and
training of contractor personnel) and information assurance in
contracts. |
9) Empowering
Individuals to Control their Personal Information (report of the Work
Group on User-Centric Identity Management, sponsored by The Information
Commissioner's Office, The Technology Strategy Board, and The Cyber
Security Knowledge Transfer Network)
This 2008 document looks at new user-centric architectures that seek to
give the individual control of their personal information, facilitating
of joined-up service delivery while reducing costs and enhancing
personal privacy. The report does not reflect a consensus of all
participants, but it does highlight the need for clear thinking about
organizational boundaries and for fresh approaches to the business and
liability models that underpin information system design. |
10) Challenges and opportunities in identity assurance (Sir James
Crosby, 2008)
Commissioned by Gordon Brown when chancellor to consider
how the public and private sectors might work together in identity
management for their mutual benefit and that of citizens and consumers,
the report sets out 10 principles for the design of a "consumer-driven
universal ID assurance system" scheme. |
11) Employee Authentication Services: Registration Authority
Operators Guide (2008)
This document provides guidance on the use of the EAS Management Server
for registering new users in EAS and enrolling these users for access to
services through EAS. EAS is a two-factor authentication service run by
Government primarily to provide access to Government databases. An
individual is placed onto EAS via a Registration Authority which is an
organisation that authenticates the identity of users and then ‘enrols’
them onto the various services and databases that can be accessed via
EAS. This enables users to access multiple applications through a
unified and validated security platform with a single token.
EAS is a cross-Government project originally led
by the Department of Children Schools and Families and supported by the
Department for Communities and Local Government, the Department for Work
and Pensions and local authorities. EAS delivers a cross-Government
|
12)
Safeguarding Identity (Immigration and Passport Service, 2009)
Led by IPS, involving some 12 departments and agencies, and building on
a wide range of contemporary initiatives (including Directgov and the
National Identity Service), 'Safeguarding Identity' aimed to deliver a
common framework for the use and handling of individuals' identity
information. It describes how the ID card and the transformational
government scheme could form a united structure in which personal
information can be passed between departments to deliver citizen-centric
services. |
13) Government ICT Strategy
(January 2010)
This document from the Cabinet Office sets out how
technology will be used to change the way government works. There are 14
strands to the ICT Strategy, which are underpinned by principles that
aim to make the way government works, smarter, cheaper and greener. |
14 & 15) RSDOPS
Parts
1
and
2 (CESG, July
2010)
The new Requirements for Secure Delivery of Online
Government Services (RSDOPS) documents replace the Information Assurance
Requirements for Transformational Government set. RSDOPS are working
documents that do not currently constitute formal Goverment policy, but
are published to increase awareness, understanding and encourage debate
in this area. The CTO Council are in the process of endorsing the RSDOPS
documents to ensure a broader engagement with stakeholders. The aim of
RSDOPS is to take forward the National Information Assurance Strategy,
which places an emphasis on information risk management and recognises
that security measures will be tailored to the specific business needs,
rather than rely on prescriptive standards set by a central authority.
RSDOPS also revises, repositions, and will replace the E-Government
Security Framework. Feedback is now sought to ensure that stakeholders'
views are captured as part of the ongoing development process and, where
appropriate, are used to refine the content.
RSDOPS consists of two parts - Principles (1) and Security Components
(2). Part 1 explains the scope and purpose of the document and related
standards, and legislation. It contains the conceptual model and
technical approach, security expectations of stakeholders and a summary
of security components for incorporation into a security case. Part 2
describes a set of overlapping security components that can be used to
express security requirements for online services. For each component a
set of levels has been defined with increasingly stringent requirements. |
16) HMG Security Policy Framework (May 2010)
The Security Policy Framework represents a new and
innovative approach to protective security and risk management in
government (replacing the Manual of Protective Security), with mandatory
requirements for framing departmental security policies to meet the
specific business needs of the organisation and its delivery
partners. This includes a requirement for departments
and agencies to apply the requirements of the Baseline Personnel
Security Standard to all HMG staff (including the armed forces),
contractors and temporary staff. It is the
reference document for information protectively marked RESTRICTED and
higher and provides the Government guidance for the implementation of
ISO/IEC27001 Series of Security Standards. |
17) Technical Risk Assessment (October 2009)
This Standard is a component of
the HMG Security Policy Framework and provides the IA practitioner with
a methodology for risk management. It is
mandatory policy for all HMG Departments and Agencies, and is also
recommended for the wider Public Sector. |
| |
|
Supporting Papers - e-ID in Europe and elsewhere |
1) The lessons of European and Middle Eastern implementations of e-ID
(April 2010)
Interoperable electronic ID has been developed as part of the
“i2010” initiative to create a “Single European Information Space” for
public service delivery across the EU. This will enable European
citizens to access services wherever they may be in Europe. In parallel,
the European Citizen Card (ECC) standard for physical and electronic
performance of cards has been under development, with the first ECC-compliant
cards available in France.
This paper looks at practical experience in both European and
non-European countries in order to learn lessons and facilitate the
roll-out of new national e-ID projects. |
2) European Citizen Card: One Pillar of Interoperable
e-ID Success (October 2008)
The ECC is an open application standard that
provides an interoperable and cross border e-services solution;
this document describes the advantages of the smart card, especially for
e-ID. |
|
3) &
4)
Coesys Biometric Enrolment Solution (2010)
and
Enrolment Solutions for the Public Sector
These solutions have been specifically developed for biometric
enrolment, and can be applied to
National
e-ID/e-Passport, HealthCard, Driving License, e-Voter Registration and
population registration etc.
Coesys offers a timesaving generic enrolment engine
designed to speed up data capture, to verify an applicant’s identity and
to ensure the quality of data captured. |
Forthcoming Subgroup Meetings
| Date |
Description |
| 14 Sep 10 |
Identity Governance Subgroup
Meeting |
More
details... |
Recent Subgroup Meetings
Other Relevant Documents and Links
|
 |
 |
| |
|