EURIM Working Group on Information
Governance
(previously Personal Identity and Data Sharing)
Introduction and Terms of Reference
This
group builds on the enormous success of EURIM’s work on Personal
Identity and Data Sharing, from the debate on the European Data
Protection Directive, through exercises on Medical Data Protection
and on Identity Cards, to the recent inquiries with regard to
Information Assurance. One consistent theme has been the need to
reconcile practical experience of what works with the aspirations of
those seeking to promote new methodologies and technologies, while
addressing “cultural problems” associated with individual and
organisational behaviour and attitudes. The Group is also engaged in
the political debate over the balance of risk between privacy and
surveillance, Another theme has been the need to provide practical
guidance as to who should be responsible for doing what, given so
much conflicting legislation over what can and should, or should
not, be retained and/or shared with whom, under what circumstances.
Objective
To rebuild confidence in the competence of the public, private and
voluntary sectors to securely manage the sharing of identity and
information services and support the creation and enforcement of
relevant professional codes of practice.
Strategy
Parliamentary
and political:
to change the nature of current debate on data protection and
information assurance by showing that secure electronic identity
management and information sharing are already commonplace,
including in the public sector, and that the need is to replicate,
reinforce and build on existing good practice.
Industrial and professional:
to provide a neutral umbrella for officials to meet with industry
(users as well as suppliers and consultants) to discuss practical
co-operation in overcoming fragmentation and confusion regarding
responsibilities, liabilities and governance. To share experience of
existing processes for handling interactions between those who do
not trust each other as well as those who do.
Work
Programme for 2009
-
Directors
Round Table:
5 work-streams have arisen from the Directors Round Table
meetings, with the overall objective of setting the agenda and
providing a forum to bring together people and organisations
that can make things happen. Another 2 are in prospect.
1.
Basic Principles –
The first task is to produce guidance
covering the elements that constitute good governance (clarity
of accountability, responsibility, ownership, quality, security,
availability, people processes etc.).
An additional aim is the creation
of credible policy frameworks
against which suppliers can deliver transparently, thus
enhancing client and customer confidence in their products and
services.
The Subgroup is working on an innovative, succinct a 1-page
document
with links to existing guidance and comments on what still needs
to be addressed,
supported by an animated voice-over video which illustrates the
hierarchy of the concepts and processes involved.
2.
Security by Design –
Major users (both public and private) and suppliers are being
brought together
with the aim of
incentivising industry to co-operate to devise better and
inherently more secure products, and to use an appropriate set
of standards with a secure architecture in which outputs are
defined. An additional aim is to set and use common standards
for inter-operability frameworks which can be mandated by major
customers (civil or military) in the knowledge that major
suppliers can and will supply products and services that will
fit together. Activity teams are expected to produce early
deliverables by end Q1.
This is an ambitious exercise to change market behaviour and
introduce a new security paradigm, with EURIM providing a
neutral umbrella for bringing major players together: users
(public/private, military/civil) and suppliers, internationally
as well as nationally. A delegation from the Subgroup recently
met representatives of the Public Secure Network on 15 April to
discuss the Government Conveyancing Network (the ‘glue’ between
service provider networks), to press the case for an
architecture-based approach to security.
3. Value of Information
–
Focus is on
the incentives and benefits that derive from treating
information as an asset: to be maintained and exploited securely
and effectively. It also agreed deliverables for May and June
with a final report in September covering the means of valuing
information in order to help set budgets and justify investment
in improving quality and security, working with the Knowledge
Council and Audit Commission inter alia.
The Subgroup is developing a repository on the EURIM companion 'microsite'
(link at the top of this page) of documentation, research and
tools, e.g. presenting evidence linking performance to
information management maturity, and covering methodologies for
benchmarking and measuring performance etc. EURIM will assist
the Knowledge Council in the areas of how to measure and enhance
the value of data, and improving information and knowledge
management skills and culture.
The overall purpose of the Subgroup is to:
***
raise awareness of the importance of and potential for better
exploitation of information assets within organisations,
particularly within the public sector;
***
influence the policies and strategies concerning how to achieve
radically improved information management culture in the public
sector;
***
provide high level guidance on available approaches to valuing
the information asset and to measuring and benchmarking an
organisation’s information management capability.
4.
ID Governance
–
Targets and outcomes are being identified
under the premise that while there is no single structure that
meets all needs, there are some common principles of governance
that Government will try to legislate on, across all
departments.
A possible approach is to consider how citizens’ needs are met
in a business model for identity cards and systems. The
difficulty is, given the public’s lack of trust in Government
generally to look after personal data, whether there will be
sufficient popular buy-in: there needs to be a single, secure
unique identity and a demonstrable benefit for the citizen.
A key aim is to educate a cadre of politicians and policy
advisers who can ensure that policy follows a better set of
frameworks than would otherwise have been the case. A common
policy is necessary for the establishment of interoperability
and providing for effective identity governance. The next
meeting of the Subgroup will focus on a mission statement and a
plan of action.
5.
Quality
of Information
– proposal awaited
Forthcoming
Meetings
Recent
Meetings
Group
Outputs (Papers & Briefings)
Other Relevant Documents and Links
|