EURIM Working Group on UK
Competitiveness in the Global Knowledge Economy
(2004-2007
Programme)
This
page and the links from it record previous work
carried out by this
group.
Back
to Current programme
Introduction and Terms of Reference
Meeting Details, Agendas, Tabled Papers and Minutes
Group Outputs (Papers and Briefings)
Other Relevant Documents & Links
Working Drafts (Restricted Access)
Introduction and Terms of Reference
Objectives:
To ensure that the UK (and the EU as a whole) are competitive (in
terms of regulation, skills, communications etc.) in a global
knowledge economy where jobs, including high value jobs, may
increasingly be located anywhere in the world.
Group
Objectives and Activities for 2006
EURIM's knowledge economy group has
two main objectives for 2006. They are:
- To
complement the HM Treasury (Gowers) review of the UK IPR regime
by keeping parliamentarians abreast
of the relevant issues and ensure well-informed debate .
-
Produce an overview of
the factors
that determine the location of knowledge-based industries, look
at the UK's performance in terms of those factors, and identify
whether any urgent action is required.
1 - IPR Regime
IPR
has emerged as a key issue in achieving a successful knowledge
economy. It is therefore essential to support a fair and
robust IPR regime across Europe to protect investment and foster
competition. The IPR related activities of this group
can be found on the IPR
subgroup webpages.
2 - Locational Factors for Knowledge-based
businesses
Preliminary
research suggests that the factors influencing where businesses
locate their operations in the world have changed over the last ten
years. Traditionally, business location was affected by
quantitative factors - cost of land, labour, transport, raw
materials, and the availability of grants and subsidies. Now
those factors have been replaced by more qualitative criteria -
skills, IPR regime, regulations, red tape, available technology,
broadband infrastructures, language, culture, etc. Taxation
and political and economic stability are the only factors that have
remained relatively constant.
At the same time,
the contribution that
knowledge-based businesses make to the economies of many countries
has grown to such an extent that it now outstrips that of
traditional manufacturing. However, unlike manufacturing
operations, these knowledge businesses are not tied to physical
assets or raw materials and can choose to locate their operations
anywhere in the world. That means that those countries
offering the most advantageous environment will attract these
businesses, thereby benefiting from the jobs and tax revenues
created by them. Competition for these businesses is now truly
global.
It is therefore
vital that UK and EU policy keeps pace with both these sets of
changes so that there are no barriers to organisations wishing to
locate in this region. In some areas of the EU, policy has
lagged behind and those countries are paying the price as whole
sectors have relocated elsewhere. Some say that nowhere is
this more evident than in the German pharmaceutical industry, a
world leader until a few years ago.
Although the UK currently leads the rest of the EU as a destination
for inward investment, this position is not secure. For
instance, the Japanese car industry in the whole of the UK employs
fewer people than currently work for Citibank in London, yet
Citibank could relocate its operations, along with its highly-paid
jobs, to the other side of the world within a few days.
This sub-group is
therefore exploring the locational factors for knowledge businesses
and will prepare a briefing for Parliamentarians and Civil Servants
that lists the various factors and identifies areas where current
policy or practice is creating barriers to inwards investment.
Initial findings are available here.
Group
Activities during 2005
Towards the end of 2004 and during
2005 the group focused on IPR issues, on the premise that a good
Intellectual Property Rights regime is absolutely essential for a
successful Knowledge Economy:- as business moves from a
manufacturing base to a knowledge base, we become increasingly
dependent on IP.
The work was undertaken by the IPR
subgroup, which produced an information paper on IPR to help
parliamentarians understand this complex subject, reviewed the UK
Implementation of the Enforcement Directive and prepared a response
to the European Commission on the proposed Supplementary Enforcement
Directive (this proposed Directive was withdrawn in December 2005 so
work was suspended pending a further communication from the
Commission).
Click Here
for all information including group history, objectives, outputs and
relevant documents. Or visit www.eurim.org.uk/activities/ipr/ipr.php
Group
Activities during 2004
At the recent meeting of EURIM's Content
and Issues Panel, chaired by Ian Stewart MP, a key focus was
agreed on Communications, Competitiveness and Innovation.
With the impending UK Presidency of the EU (second half of 2005)
and of the G8 at the same time, we have an ideal opportunity now
to plan to brief UK Parliamentarians to progress issues of
Communication, Competitiveness and Innovation during the UK
Presidencies.
A planning meeting to agree objectives
and strategies was held on 22nd June kindly hosted at IBM South
Bank. This was followed by a briefing meeting with
Malcolm Harbour MEP to identify political priorities and areas for
action.
Click here for
papers, agenda and minutes
The group held its first meeting relating to its 2004-5 programme (Making the most of the UK's forthcoming
presidencies of the G8 and the EU) on 22nd June 2004. The
group also met as EURIM's Competitiveness Group in 2003 to make an
informal response to the Trade and Industry Select Committee Inquiry
on the 1998 White Paper "Our Competitive Future - Building the
Knowledge Driven Economy". Previously the group looked at
broader aspects relating to the UK's competitiveness as a place to
do e-business, particularly Broadband. For minutes and meeting
outputs including our response to the Select Committee Inquiry,
click here.
|